A Day To Remember, Victory Records Court Case Postponed

by Zack Zarrillo - Oct 2, 2013


MAJOR UPDATE: POZ Exclusive: A Day To Remember Win Ruling Against Victory Records

A Day To Remember and Victory Records were set to meet in court today for a verdict that would decide whether or not fans would see and hear the release of Common Courtesy on October 8th. PropertyOfZack has received word from trusted sources however that that the court hearing was postponed to a date that has not yet been set. 

It is unclear when both parties will meet in court again (though the band does have an off date from the House Party Tour on October 7th), and what exactly that means for the release of the long-awaited album. It is believed that if the court does not make a decision before October 8th, that the album will not be released on its set date.

POZ is actively checking with our sources and we are also monitoring court and public records for more information, but for now you can read our earlier coverage with Victory Records’ lawyer (via AltPress), original statements from the band and label issued upon the public discovery of the lawsuit, our original rundown of the lawsuit, and more below!

Related Stories:
Judgement Day: Will ‘Common Courtesy’ Be Released Next Week? 


A Day To Remember’s original statement on lawsuit:

A Day To Remember would like to make it clear that they did not announce nor seek any attention regarding their ongoing suit with Victory Records. This information has been public record since May of 2011 and they have no intention of speaking publicly or disparagingly regarding their disagreement with Victory. A Day To Remember will continue to release music for their fans and are looking forward to touring in 2012.

Victory Records’ original statement on lawsuit:

Recent reports of claims filed by the Victory artist A Day to Remember (ADTR) in litigation presently pending in US District Court in the Northern District of Illinois (a case that was just transferred from Nashville upon Victory’s successful motion based upon improper venue) have misleadingly stated that the principal issue in the case concerns the payment of royalties. The lawsuit, filed shortly after the band hired new management, is really about the band’s refusal to fulfill their 5-album contractual commitment to Victory and their newfound desire to move to a major label. Recycled and often apocryphal stories of misguided and unsuccessful attempts by a few Victory bands to jump ship from the label that put them on the map have one common truthful thread; they always end badly for the band. In those cases, the bands eventually seek reconciliation and often ask to return to the Victory fold after having been disappointed by their post-Victory experiences. Victory is confident that this dispute will be resolved to the satisfaction of both the band and Victory, and that ADTR will continue to deliver great music to Victory in the coming years. Victory continues to honor its commitment to ADTR by placing its significant resources behind the band’s current album, What Separates Me From You, which continues to climb the charts and meet or exceed Victory’s expectations. The band, in the meantime, has enjoyed the benefits of the hundreds of thousands of dollars in record royalties generated from their album sales, which Victory accounts for in full compliance with its contract. Victory’s job remains the same- work hard, sell records and abide by our agreements. 

Original POZ rundown of the lawsuit:

A Day To Remember are alleging:
A) that they have fulfilled their 5-album deal with Victory records (the band actually lists eight albums which they assert count toward fulfilling this obligation: What Separates Me From You, three editions of Homesick, two editions of For Those Who Have Heart, Old Record, and the Attack Of The Killer B-Sides EP).
B) that Victory filed copyright applications for the sound recordings of A Day To Remember’s albums that A Day To Remember do not believe were assigned to Victory.
C) that Victory are inappropriately withholding money owed to A Day To Remember from merch sales.
D) that Victory are additionally wrongly withholding >$100,000 from A Day To Remember as a “penalty” as part of a dispute over merch sales rights.

A Day To Remember are requesting from the Court:
A) a declaration that A Day To Remember have fulfilled their contract, and that A Day To Remember are now free to sign with other labels.
B) a declaration that A Day To Remember own all of their sound recording copyrights.
C) an accounting from Victory of any money which might be due to the band.
D) a reward of damages and attorneys fees from Victory.

Victory’s Response To A Day To Remember:
A) denies all of A Day To Remember’s allegations,
B) raises a number of technical defenses, and
C) asserts their own claim against A Day To Remember.

This claim that Victory is asserting against A Day To Remember alleges:
A) that A Day To Remember manufactured and sold their own merch via the internet in violation of their contract with Victory.
B) that A Day To Remember interfered with Victory’s ability to manufacture merch by refusing to approve new designs.

Victory are requesting from the Court:
A) dismissal of A Day To Remember’s complaint.
B) a reward of damages from A Day To Remember.

Victory also states in their release that they’ve won a motion to relocate the proceedings from Tennessee (where A Day To Remember filed the case) to Illinois, though there’s no copy of the motion or order within the document.  

Both A Day To Remember and Victory are interpreting the Deal Memo (Ie, the contract between A Day To Remember and Victory) differently, and now both parties are asking the court to decide which side has it right. 

  1. food-4nd-you reblogged this from de-atley
  2. de-atley reblogged this from propertyofzack
  3. xyliephonee reblogged this from xorevengexo
  4. xorevengexo reblogged this from propertyofzack
  5. beardedbaka reblogged this from propertyofzack
  6. fuckthisurlseriously reblogged this from propertyofzack and added:
    does this mean we’re fucked!? :((
  7. xfaridmuftix reblogged this from propertyofzack
  8. newfoundluly reblogged this from propertyofzack
  9. swoopjawn reblogged this from propertyofzack and added:
    Seems like this album will NEVER come out!
  10. darkersideofmybrightesthopes reblogged this from propertyofzack
  11. giantmonkeybro reblogged this from yrgonnamissitall
  12. neserestofeternity reblogged this from propertyofzack
  13. isleptwithkevinskaff reblogged this from itstewmainstream
  14. itstewmainstream reblogged this from yrgonnamissitall
  15. yrgonnamissitall reblogged this from propertyofzack
  16. gnarlyjedi reblogged this from propertyofzack
  17. carl0076 reblogged this from propertyofzack
  18. ph3romonecvlt reblogged this from simonsaysneverchange
  19. lonewolfx5 reblogged this from propertyofzack
  20. simonsaysneverchange reblogged this from propertyofzack and added:
    Fuck the law. We need that shit now!
  21. spencerdoesthings reblogged this from propertyofzack
  22. frozen-senseless reblogged this from propertyofzack and added:
  23. jayypurp reblogged this from propertyofzack
  24. natdoooog reblogged this from propertyofzack
  25. tamc1337 reblogged this from propertyofzack
  26. cockman-dickman reblogged this from propertyofzack and added:
    "it always ends badly for the band" yea dude hatebreed and btbam are doing pretty bad now right?
  27. hopelesss-romantics reblogged this from propertyofzack
  28. opentheseas reblogged this from propertyofzack
  29. the-mighty-midget-of-asgard reblogged this from propertyofzack
  30. wakaflackalypse reblogged this from propertyofzack